In the last two Republican presidential debates Michelle Bachmann has declared that a State has no authority to require it's citizens to purchase a good, i.e. healthcare as in Massachusetts.  She is absolutely wrong and it is quite frankly embarrassing that as a lawyer she does not know our constitutional framework of government while passing herself off as a guardian of the Constitution and the "Tea Party" candidate.

 

The Federal Constitution is a limited framework of government specifically defining what the federal government can and cannot do.  The Tenth Amendment to the Constitution reserves to the States and to the people ALL powers not delegated to the federal government by the Constitution.  This is so basic a concept that I cringe whenever the congresswoman declares otherwise.  The power to compel a citizen to purchase a good or service is not within the Commerce Clause power of the Federal Constition, but that does not imply or mean that a State does not have that power. 

 

Remember, at the passage of the Constitution several of the States had state religions.  This did not violate the First Amendment because the Bill of Rights only applied to the newly formed federal government and not the states.  The application of the Fourteenth Amendment and the incorporation doctrine has changed the original framework, but even that argument does not help the congresswoman with her erroneous interpretation of law.

 

As a matter of natural law no state or sovereign should compel the purchase of a good or service as a condition of citizenship.  To do so makes one a slave or servant of the state.  However, what is improper as a matter of natural law is different than whether, under our republican form of constitutional government a State can compel such action.  If the people of a state think it is improper to enforce such a mandate then they need to amend their state constitution to prohibit the state from exercising that authority. The rules of the constitutional road are really rather simple if we would just endeavor to apply them.

 

During a recent interview on this topic the Congresswoman was asked where in the Federal Constitution a State is prohibited from mandating the purchase of healthcare.  She fumbled with an answer and only when pressed said it is "inherent" in the Constitution.  It is progressive jurists believing in a "living and breathing" constitution who find things "inherent" in it, such as the right of privacy which gave us Roe v. Wade.  

 

When she said this last night at the Tea Party sponsored debate and the audience loudly applauded, I realized that there is much work and education that still needs to be done. It is simply not good enough for her to say she will take a copy of the Constitution with her into the Oval Office should she by elected President. She must read and understand it first.   I like Mrs. Bachmann personally, and I cheered for her at her appearance at Angie's Subs.  It does not help the cause of limited constitutional government however for her, in an attempt to score points against political opponents, to misstate such fundamental components of the system of government established by the Founders.

Views: 47

Comment

You need to be a member of First Coast Tea Party to add comments!

Join First Coast Tea Party

Comment by DURWIN WALTER DAVIS on September 14, 2011 at 2:20pm
You're probably correct.  95% of registered voters appear to not care beyond a candidate's looks, their stage presence and other vital facts concerning the "job".  What amazes me is the lack of past lessons, obviously not learned.  German citizens did nothing to halt the advance of the Nazis because it did not immediately effect them.  This is after they suffered the deprivations suffered during and after WW I, from 1914 to 1934.  Learning nothing from this experience, they repeat from 1939 to about 1953.  Our nation's civilians have not had to suffer these conditions...yet.  Hussein has an agenda that is ardently out to destroy this country on all fronts.  All of his mentors, from childhood to community organizer, have drilled into him HOW to destroy this nation.  Why am I the only one cursed to have the vision to see this.  It is more than blatant.  Our tax code changes from regime to regime.  "Treasury" is an executive post.  Congress, in their ultimate laziness, has allowed through blanket legislation to have "Treasury" have a never ending pass to implement regulations ad infinitum.  We sleep.
Comment by Cord Byrd on September 14, 2011 at 11:02am
Quite honestly, other than Ron Paul (this is not an endorsement just a statement of fact that he is the most constitutionally grounded), I have little faith in the candidates and their understanding of our republican form of government.  Unfortunately they are states rights proponents when it suits them and supporters of leviathan when it does not.
Comment by DURWIN WALTER DAVIS on September 14, 2011 at 10:26am
I wonder how many of the other candidates feel the way HR Bachmann does, say, Ron Paul?
Comment by Patricia M. McBride on September 13, 2011 at 10:16pm
Thank you so much for the great explanation.

National Debt Clock

  

The First CoastTea Party is a non-profit organization. We have no deep-pocketed special interest funding our efforts.

You may contact us at:

First Coast Tea Party
1205 Salt Creek Island Dr
Ponte Vedra, FL 32082
904-392-7475

Helpful Links

Blog Posts

RYAN NICHOLS - Hardened Criminal?? Seriously??

If you're not already aware. This is what's going on in DC while dangerous criminals are allowed back out on the streets.  It's horrifying that this is happening to our citizens and veterans for protesting the hijacking of our election process. This is still happening! They are STILL being tortured and treated like full on terrorists. 

You may not be aware of the typical things they're forced to go through...…

Continue

Posted by Babs Jordan on August 14, 2022 at 8:44am

© 2024   Created by LeadershipCouncil.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service