Ordinance 2012-296 ACTION NEEDED

[Leanne King]

     By now you heard of Ordinance 2012-296. The previous communications have detailed the ordinance and its specific implication.  To site the Ordinance Preamble, “Whereas, the City of Jacksonville seeks to build a reputation as a welcoming community for bright and talented members of a workforce…..”; this is a suggested ordinance giving the Human Rights Council the powers to enforce the ordinance against businesses “should it be proven that they discriminate” on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identification.  The original ordinance also eliminated references to the United States Constitution and laws of the State and failed to define sexual orientation and gender identification.  Is this a new special class of people?   It suggests that Jacksonville is an environment that is hostile to the gay/lesbian/transgender people. This suggestion has been disproven by recent two national level survey’s that document that we rank number 3 and 4 for being a friendly city and a great place to live.

 

     This bill is in front of our city council for vote.  It has met some resistance from conservatives, Tea Party, religious organizations and other First Amendment Rights organizations. The opposition stands just as firm in their beliefs that this ordinance is needed so that they are treated fairly. While there are some personal level stories as to their treatment none relate to workplace/community or housing discrimination. We know that you cannot legislate the personal behaviors of some individuals who make a choice to be hateful to another.

     There is now an attempt to amend the proposed ordinance by reinstating verbiage to the US Constitution and eliminating “gender identification” and perhaps “sexual expression.” This however will not solve the issues that this ordinance in any form will create.

     I ask that you email the city council members listed below and feel free to utilize any of the information presented below.

 

                               Ask yourself and your council member:

   Are you willing to commit to the premise that Jacksonville is hostile to the gay/lesbian community?

   Are you willing to believe that only the gay, lesbian world is creative as your message so clearly stated in the council meeting last week?

   Are you willing to commit that this is the most important issue to attract business to Jacksonville?

   Are you willing to lay the legal and financial burdens of this legislation at the feet of thousands of the small business owners in our city?

   Are you willing to impose the so called special needs of these citizens while ignoring and removing the rights of so many others?

   Are you willing to take the responsibility for the thousands of other employees who while utilizing their freedom of speech about their beliefs both personal and religious may be sued or their employer sued by someone who finds an innocent comment “offensive to them”?

   Are you willing to accept the ultimate personal responsibility that comes with your support of this ordinance when it is now perfectly clear that the origin of this ordinance came FROM AN EXTERNAL SOURCE, with monies behind it being QUESTIONABLE?

   Are you willing to tell the pubic the truth that this is being pushed at the NATIONAL LEVEL by those who have a much larger and destructive AGENDA?

   Are you willing to be honest and know that this group of OUR CITIZENS are being used to push a much larger attack on EVERYONE’S freedoms? Specifically of SPEECH AND RELIGION?

                    This bill is not needed.  There is no systemic discrimination. 

 

In addition to the above questions the following information is provided for understanding.

The Ordinance:

1)     Creates New and Special Rights for Homosexuals: The ordinance creates new and special rights for homosexuals by creating a new protected class and a special legal classification based upon “sexual orientation, gender identity and gender expression”.  

 

2)     Weakens Florida’s Marriage Amendment as the Union of One Man and One Woman:  The ordinance like others around the country have been used to undermine and overturn state marriage laws and state constitutional amendments defining marriage as the union of one man and one woman.  Gay rights activists around the country have used the collective scheme of nondiscrimination laws like this one to create a new protected class and legalize homosexual marriages in states like Vermont, Iowa, New Hampshire and Washington, DC.

 

3)     Removes All References to the U.S. Constitution:  The ordinance (unbelievably) removes all references to the “United States Constitution” in the city code and deletes all language referring to “civil rights found under the US Constitution”. The ordinance language thereby removes the rights, protections and limitations given to citizens by the highest law of the land. 

 

4)     Creates Legal Defenses for Pedophiles:  The ordinances gender identity and gender expression language would allow men to be able to use women’s bathrooms (and vice versa) in “public accommodations” based upon their subjective sense of whether they are a male or female allowing for pedophiles to have a defense for using girl’s bathrooms.  This shocking provision is being forced onto cities all around the country.  The security and privacy of locker rooms, dressing rooms, bathrooms and other separate facilities are all compromised. 

5)   Creates More Lawsuits and Regulations for Businesses: The ordinance forces individual citizens, businesses and landlords in Jacksonville to be liable to be sued for money damages if they choose to not hire homosexual, transgendered, bi-sexual or gender confused persons in their small businesses, or choose not to accept similar persons as tenants in their private homes or apartments. 

 

6)     Violates Religious Freedoms- The ordinance forces Christians and other people of faith to violate their rights of conscience and good faith religious beliefs in business and employment situations and with housing decisions for private property owners.  

 

     I implore you to send a message to your city council NOW!  Tell them that you oppose this ordinance in any form.  Additionally, if you can get to City Hall this Tuesday for the next meeting PLEASE ATTEND.

Our physical presence makes a HUGE difference. 

     Send this to your list of small business owners so that they too can respond. Send it to your friends and ask them to email and support their city.

     While it appears to be most important to send the message to Lori Boyer, Jim Love, Greg Anderson. Robin Lumb, Bill Bishop, Ray Holt and Dr. Johnny Gaffney a message to each member is highly effective.

 

District 2: William Bishop                                        [e-mail]

District 11: Ray Holt                                                [e-mail]

At Large (Group 4) Greg Anderson                           [e-mail]

At Large (Group 5) Robin Lumb                                [e-mail]

District 3: Richard Clark                                          [e-mail]

District 5: Lori N. Boyer                                           [e-mail]

District 7: Dr. Johnny Gaffney -                              [e-mail]

District 8: E. Denise Lee                                          [e-mail]

District 9: Warren Jones                                           [e-mail]

District 10: Reginald Brown                                     [e-mail]

District 14: Jim Love                                                [e-mail]

At Large (Group 2) John R. Crescimbeni                   [e-mail]

At Large (Group 3) Stephen C. Joost                         [e-mail]

District 1: Clay Yarborough                                     [e-mail]

District 4: Don Redman                                           [e-mail]

At-Large (Group 1): Kimberly Daniels                      [e-mail]

District 6: Matt Schellenberg                                   [e-mail]

District 12: Doyle Carter                                         [e-mail]

District 13: Bill Gulliford                                          [e-mail]

 

     In addition to your emails you can do more, there is a City Council meeting scheduled at City Hall tomorrow June 26^th at 5PM. It is critical that as many people as possible show up as a public display of support  AGAINST this bill. Know that the opposition will be there in mass.

Thank you

[Maxine Jessica Roberts]

Ken, I've done my research on this because it affects me, 

Josephus a Jewish Philosopher during biblical times said of effeminate eunuchs. "It is evident that their soul had become effeminate, they have transfused that effeminacy to their body also." 

Not all eunuchs were used as harem guardians. They were also teachers, monks, and sexual slaves to kings like Xerxes. 

And roman laws had various different laws pertaining to Eunuchs. separating them into  Natural, Castrated, and Religious. 

[Maxine Jessica Roberts]

Actually Ken, There are multiple cases in the Bible where Transexuals (At the time Classified as Eunuchs and under roman law falling under 3 classifications, Eunuchs who prefer same sex partners, eunuchs who have "feminine souls" and have their genital removed, and Eunuchs who voluntarily remove themselves from the Gene pool.) 

There are multiple stories where these Eunuchs were participating in specific events in the bible. Including throwing Jezebel out of her window. And being the person that Jesus told his disciples to seek out as the Eunuch would guide them to where they held their last supper. 

Also. Transgender is not a sexual orientation. Transgender people are not all homosexuals either. 

And having both genitalia happens, its called being intersex and there are multiple variations of it. But that is not a qualifier for being bisexual. 

Sexual Orientation (who you are attracted to) has nothing to do with Gender Identity (how you identify your gender), or Gonad Configuration (your gonads at birth).

Also, If sexual orientation and gender identity are choices. When did you honestly make that choice?

You were born, a doctor identified your gonadal configuration, and claimed you were of a gender based on that configuration without doing any other tests (they don't test the chromosomes of kids to see if they have intersex condition unless there is a physical identifier in the gonads) 

So when did you sit down and say "I'm a guy. I like women." OR was it just natural to you?

[amanda choate]

Patricia, So your freedom is more important than someone else's freedom, interesting. In my religion, Reformed Nihilistic Rastafarians, we believe that the only people it is okay to discriminate against are those who don't follow our teachings, everyone else you have to respect. So as a RNRer we hold that nothing is more important than being one with Ras Tafari and that anyone who doesn't believe that should get stoned.

Ken you are wrong, legally speaking. Your opinion was last supported by Plessy v Ferguson.

[Maxine Jessica Roberts]

Jay the funny thing is, if 296 doesn't pass a gay employeer could fire someone for being straight. :#

[Maxine Jessica Roberts]

Patricia please tell me where your religion says anything against Transexuals?

[Patricia M. McBride]

And, what freedom is there in in it for those who would be forced (legislated) to violate their religious beliefs (limiting their freedom of speech, and giving up their basic rights of freedom of association) in order to accomodate a life style which violates thier beliefs?  It is a 2 way street. 

[Maxine Jessica Roberts]

What freedom is there in letting others dictate who you are to yourself. 

[Maxine Jessica Roberts]

John, Humans, as well as some other organisms, can have a chromosomal arrangement that is contrary to their phenotypic sex, that is, XX males or XY females. See, for example, XX male syndromeand androgen insensitivity syndrome.

[Maxine Jessica Roberts]

John calling me by the gender identifiers that I do not identify with makes me feel unwelcome, that is the entire reason you keep using them. If I started calling you a girl, woman, ma'am constantly even though you present yourself as a hetersexual cisgender male. You'd get pissed. 

[amanda choate]

This post still has legs, wow. You know I started responding to this post way back when with this post:

I think the entire Civil Rights Act should be struck. Not granting others equality is our right. We should not have laws that tell us how to act. Its unConstitutional. Each individual is free to discriminate against whomever they choose.

No one, but no one thought that was an ill-conceived thing to write. The 1964 Civil Rights Act has been so bad for this country. It took force of law to make social changes, as it has always been.

Why are Mormons in Utah, because there were no laws protecting them from bigotry. And if anyone here thinks that a gay perosn is not discriminated against, just read the posts here. Abhorrent is one word to used to describe their lifestyle and they themselves. So certainly there would be no discrimination towards them. When the Tea PArty talks about liberty, and they do, alot. Well liberty only counts when it is evenly distributed. And government serves as the umpire, that is its role, balancing rights of different peoples and groups. It helps everyone to understand the rules if they are codified. It is about wieldiness. It is simpler when everyone knows what the rules are. If you want to live in acountry where discriminating against gays is accepted may I suggest, Iran, Sudan, Bothswana, Central African Republic and on and on. Those are the kinds of places you live when you want to judge others.