OBAMA'S ATTACK ON LIBYA REPORTED TO BE BASED ON GLOBAL GOVERNANCE MILITARY DOCTRINE TIED TO SOROS

[J.R.]

I regret to say that I find the information in the below-linked article both believable and alarming. It helps to explain Obama's rapid rise from obscurity to the highest elected office in the United States of America, for it took a lot of money and influence to make that happen. It also leads me to believe that the habitual frequent delays in Obama's decision-making could be explainable by those decisions having to be filtered through Soros-connected activists advising Obama. In this case, billionaire Soros' activist in the White House is none other than Obama's National Security Council Special Adviser on Human Rights, Samantha Power, who has strong ties to Soros and is a champion of the global governance military doctrine, "Responsibility to Protect," that Obama is claimed to have followed in his attack on Libya.

The above also helps to explain why Obama no longer depends on advice from his U.S. Senate-approved Cabinet and gives life to the speculation that formerly unknown and unaccomplished Obama's mach speed rise to power is due to his having been a George Soros-created puppet, with Soros and his like-minded global governance minders pulling his strings.  Further, it makes me wonder who actually is our President.

This situation bears international implications that are antithetical to the content of the Constitution of the United States.

Below are some excerpts from the news article that you can read in full at the link provided:

"Philanthropist billionaire George Soros is a primary funder and key proponent of the global organization that promotes the military doctrine used by the Obama administration to justify the recent airstrikes targeting the regime of Moammar Gadhafi in Libya.
The activist who founded and coined the name of the doctrine, "Responsibility to Protect," sits on several key organizations alongside Soros.

Also, the Soros-funded global group that promotes Responsibility to Protect is closely tied to Samantha Power, the National Security Council special adviser to Obama on human rights. Power has been a champion of the doctrine and is, herself, deeply tied to the doctrine's founder.

According to reports, Power was instrumental in convincing Obama to act against Libya.
The Responsibility to Protect doctrine has been described by its founders and proponents, including Soros, as promoting global governance while allowing the international community to penetrate a nation state's borders under certain conditions..."

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=278685

[J.R.]

To see Roma's posted video of Ross Perot in the Bush/Clinton/Perot debate in the 1992 presidential campaign, go here: 

http://www.fctpcommunity.org/profiles/blogs/12-us-multinational?com...

 

[JL Gawlik]

Roma, J.R. the WHOLe key to it ALL is COMMUNICATION, TRUTH, FACTS. i have been spending a lot of my time lately on blogs, news media outlets trying to get out the truth.  What really cracks me UP is how you can really spot a Socialist Progressive Liberal, they name call, sling mud and can not debate on substance or principle. We need to spread the TRUTH. We need to unite Americans.

 

The TRUTH has NO agenda.

[JL Gawlik]

Roma, we need something severe, a combination of all three. I am also regretting my lack of foresight of not voting for Ross Perot, and even Ron Paul, true patriots of our country. We need to get away from pretty people and back to common sense. You must admit that Ryan's budget is a LOT better than Obama's proposal. HOW can a President unveil a $4 plus trillion dollar budget then say he is going to cut deficits? The man is insane and anyone who agrees with him is nuts. I love the FOX News report that his administration was begging S&P not to come out with their derating of the US debt, el etc., that tells it all, this whole  administration, the Socialist Democratic Progressive Liberals and RINOs have all been very disingenuous with the American people and that is my kind version.... *G*

[J.R.]

Great video of Ross Perot, with whom I totally agree. I viewed him at that time as a spoiler, but at that time I didn't know George H. W. Bush was a world government enthusiast. Had I known, I would have voted for Perot. For me, Clinton was not an option. I believed Bush was the lesser of two evils. When I was a delegate to the Florida Victory 2000 convention, I supported George W. Bush and later voted for him in the general election, agonized over every "hanging chad" and "dimpled chad," having no idea that George W. would turn out to be a supporter of anything such as a North American Union. We need some valid choices of carefully vetted and qualified candidates from which to choose.

What is it going to take to find and support a candidate for President who actually believes in the Constitution and enforcement of the laws of this land?? What will it take to finally elect a President and members of Congress who actually take their Oath of Office seriously, strictly adhere to all requirements of the U.S. Constitution, strictly enforce all U.S. laws, and seriously protect the sovereignty of this country?

Great examples also, Roma, of cross-border shifting and off-shoring of American industries. Off-shoring began many years ago with the steel industry and the textile industry, which went mostly to Japan, Indonesia, Sri Lanka, Saigon, or China. We used to be proud of the "Made in America" label on clothing and other products. Now, they're hard to find. And even our once-thriving automobile industry has been decimated, with the Obama administration now trying to sell the government's ownership interest in the now-failing "Government Motors,"---the last vestiges of the conscripted General Motors, which Obama ruined at great cost to dealership owners, auto workers, and all American taxpayers. I'm sure Obama will be dodging and avoiding taking the blame for that colossal failure in judgment and execution on his part, both now and in his campaign for re-election. He should be hammered for that failure... he owns it.

[JL Gawlik]

I am very lost in this conversation over the Ryan budget, looking at:

 

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/vote_menu_112...

 

Where did it pass in the Senate? Roma, are you talking about the House?

 

http://www.senate.gov/pagelayout/legislative/d_three_sections_with_...

 

The Ryan budget has not been passed as far as i can see, only the appropriations not to shut down the government and continue pay for the military through Sept 2011.

 

Basically you are saying that the Ryan budget is still kicking the can down the road and not addressing any of our problems?

[J.R.]

Actually, for a thorough analysis of the Constitution and the constitutionality of actions taken by our Chief Executive, particularly the unconstitutional Libya War, I have been reading and studying Rob Natelson's comprehensive website, http://constitution.i2i.org/.  Natelson is a renowned Constitutional scholar, former professor of ca. 24 years who taught both Constitution and Advanced Constitution courses. There are many links provided on Natelson's website for in-depth analysis on a broad variety of constitutional issues.  Natelson has written an outstanding opinion on the unconstitutality of Obama's actions in taking this nation to war against Libya.

I have also re-read the Constitution and am analyzing, word for word, areas that Barack Obama and the Congress have violated. 

By the way, Roma, the charade of Congress' adopting a non-binding budget plan, shows the political cowardice and lack of seriousness of these politicians, not statesmen, who agreed to kick the hard decisions can on down the road.  What's the difference between a non-binding budget and a continuing resolution that maintains the status quo? They must be taking lessons in deceit from Obama, since he is a master of it and had no constitutional role in the budget process whatsoever.

Both Rep. Michelle Bachman and Sen. Rand Paul presented actual, binding budgets that would have put this country on the road to financial responsibility and recovery.  What it was put on instead, is a road that dead-ends in a river of red ink and fiscal insanity. 

Only Rep. Michelle Bachman had the courage to speak out and tell the American people what actually occurred in this deceptive, sham budget process and the Ryan budget that the Democrats were delighted to go along with.  For this, Dick Morris has given her high praise and referred to her as presidential material, a statement with which I strongly agree.  I will post a link to the video of Morris expressing his opinions on the subject of the passed budget and Michelle Bachman in another comment, since I don't have it handy while writing this.  Stay tuned...

[Joe Story]

Joseph Story is my name sake, Joe. I have studied a lot of his writings over the years.

[Joe Story]

JR which book are you studying?

[J.R.]

That is fantastic, Roma. Would your lesson plans on the Constitution be suitable for FCTP members? It's best to start with gaining a basic understanding of the Constitution and then build from there.  When I taught American Government to advance-placement high school seniors, the first thing I put on the syllabus for the course was the Constitution, followed by the major precedent setting court cases in which final outcomes were determined by the U.S. Supreme Court, based upon Constitutional law.

If you are agreeable, I would appreciate your posting the url addresses for your websites, blogs, YouTube, and locations for articles you have written that were published online, for our reference. Please feel free to post them here. Or, do a separate blog post for them. That way, we can refer others to your sites. 

What a great way to help parents give their children the quality education that is all to often missing in public schools. If a parent is not home schooling the child/children, they can supplement what the children are learning, and provide what is identified that they are not learning in public or private school.  And providing quality materials to promote teaching, learning and stimulus for further inquiry is surely appreciated by parents everywhere. 

[JL Gawlik]

Talking about getting J.L & J.R.'s mixed up, 5th post down, i got my C.R. mixed u with up with J.R., my apology. I guess i am so use to typing C.R. for Continuing Resolution. *G*