American Thinker: Will Obama Keep Power 'by Any Means Necessary'?

[Patricia M. McBride]

Very scary, but you better read, because I for one have wondered in some nstances.  I know Obama would love to get all those young Mexicans he is giving amnesty to into the polls on November 6.  Although we here in Florida have been making huge strides to clean up voter registers and do require ID, many states like California do not require ID and even encourage people to commit voter fraud just by virtue of the system they use.  There in lies the reason Obama wanted to get rid of the electoral college, so he could just count popular vote which would include all the fraudulent votes from the states who have representatives who support this arrogant dictator in chief and all his far left radical ideas for destroying this country and everything we hold dear.  You might want to pop over to some of the articles this timely piece links to as there is definitely reason to be concerned when you tie it all altogether.

......................................................................

August 21, 2012

By Stella Paul

Let's go there: if Obama thinks he's losing, will he allow safe and fair elections on November 6? And if he does lose, will he peacefully turn over power to Mitt Romney on January 20, 2013? Or will he cling to power "by any means necessary," as a highly placed insider alleges?

Now, I'm truly sorry to raise such disgusting, un-American, crazy-sounding questions, but, alas, they're not crazy, and I've got a disquieting amount of evidence. The Democrats have already accused Romney of murdering a woman with cancer, financial felonies, and not filing taxes for ten years -- the last charge delivered by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid on the Senate floor, on the basis of absolutely no evidence whatsoever.

By Democrat standards, I've got enough proof to put away Obama, et al. for life without parole.

Whatever chicanery Obama and his investors may be contemplating, it will probably unfold against some gargantuan crisis, manufactured or otherwise. So cast your mind back to September 11, 2001, the day of the New York mayoral primary.

In the chaos after the attacks, Mayor Rudolph Giuliani, who was term-limited from running, pleaded that his leadership was essential and that he should be granted an extra three months in office after his term ran out on January 1. Giuliani's unprecedented power-grab was rightfully scorned by his eventual successor, Michael Bloomberg. So what did Bloomberg do when he ran into term limits? He deployed his multi-billion-dollar fortune to manipulate the law and buy himself a quasi-legal third term, claiming that only he had the expertise to handle the 2008 financial crisis.

My point? Politicians a great deal more conventional than Obama have loathed giving up power, and they have used crises and unethical machinations to try to keep it.

Now, let's look at just some of the disturbing evidence that indicates that Obama and his investors are plotting something big:

Super-High-Level Trial Balloons

USA Today reported that on September 27, 2011, Governor Beverly Perdue, Democrat of North Carolina, told a Rotary Club audience, "I think we ought to suspend, perhaps, elections for Congress for two years and just tell them we won't hold it against them, whatever decisions they make, to just let

them help this country recover[.] ... You want people who don't worry about the next election." When outrage greeted her suggestion, she retreated to the standard defense: she was just joking. What a kidder!

Meanwhile, that same month, Peter Orszag, Obama's former director of the Office of Management and Budget, published an article in The New Republic titled "Too Much of A Good Thing: Why We Need Less Democracy." In it, he posited that the country was too polarized; hence, "radical as it sounds, we need to counter the gridlock of our political institutions by making them a bit less democratic."

Please note that these suggestions to suspend elections and radically reduce democratic control did not come from basement-dwelling bloggers. They came from the governor of the very state in which the Democrats are holding their national convention and from one of Obama's most prominent Cabinet members. Their close timing suggests that these ideas were circulating at the highest levels of the Democrat power elite.

"Whom Does the Government Intend to Shoot?"

That's the question recently posed by retired Major General Jerry Curry in the Daily Caller, in light of horrifying reports that the Social Security Administration is buying 174,000 rounds of hollow-point bullets for distribution to 41 locations in the U.S.

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/08/will_obama_keep_power_by_any...

[amanda choate]

Mickey Mouse has never gotten a registration card. But the groups who collect registrations are required by law to submit all registrations. It is the law. The facts are the facts . But please live free of those intrusive things called facts. No one here cares about the truth, they are partisans. They give a tinkers damn if the poor and aged are excluded from the polls. They aren't real citizens anyway.

[amanda choate]

http://www.truthaboutfraud.org/pdf/TruthAboutVoterFraud.pdf

The facts are all there. I am not saying you are wrong, I am saying you have been fed a bunch of hooey. And this is about winning elections by any means necessary.

[amanda choate]

TheTruth About Voter Fraud in Wisconsin
By Justin. Leavitt
Look it up.

[amanda choate]

Why cut out early voting?

[amanda choate]

Republican secretary of state. Anyone prosecuted?

[amanda choate]

Whatever voter fraud there has been would not be corrected by id laws. Pennsylvania was unable to produce single instance of voter fraud in their case. Not a single instance. Id laws do nothing to address any voter fraud that has occurred. No law passed addresses any of the real concerns that are out there. Otherwise why are we limiting voting hours? Too many people voting? How does expanding the opportunity to vote end fraud? How does fining people for collecting registrations eliminate voter fraud. In person voter fraud is not an issue. Show me one example where it has been a problem. 86 times in 196,000,000 votes
That is .000042%. 86,000 wouldn't be one percent. It is 10,000 times smaller than that.
If you want to say the RNC and various state parties screwed the pooch, fine. That political operatives attempted to change the means to a voice within the RNC, no prob. But no instances of in person voter fraud. That is a lie.
I put my numbers out there, sourced from the Brennan Center for Justice. Prove me wrong. Show me where people have been caught voting fraudulently.

[amanda choate]

Can there no cases of voter fraud in any of the state. They're only instances of the RNC accounting to manipulate the outcome.

[amanda choate]

, I'm not sure I understand whether you are referring to go turf rod within the RNC election nomination process. Or if you're referring to some other voter fraud then spread among all elections. I am just not sure that I have seen any. In the Pennsylvania case they received it was determined there were 86 instances of voter fraud across the United States of the last 196,000,000 votes cast. That hardly seems like a problem.

[amanda choate]

Ken here are the results. You cannot punish Romney for winnig because no one else was viable. He ran against the gang who couldn't shoot straight. Cain and Gingrich were on book tours.  Bachmann was just dropping in from Crazyville. Santorum cared more about abortion than becoming president. Huntsman just wanted out of china.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2012_Republican_Party_p...

[amanda choate]

Rona and Tom, What are you talking about in your post where you say:

With all the voter fraud we have been able to document in the RNC and DNC, one has to wounder how much is still hidden from us.

What is this in regards to?